It has hardly been a secret that the EU has been taking a markedly harder line on Alphabet Inc./Google (GOOGL) over the last couple of years than U.S. regulators since Margrethe Vestager took over as head of the EU’s antitrust agency in 2014. And so it’s not too shocking that the agency appears set to impose a hefty fine on the web giant for allegedly unfairly promoting its Google Shopping ads relative to third-party shopping services.
All the same, considering the strength of the arguments that Google had made in defense of Google shopping, and how the FTC and other regulators probing Google have limited their probes to other issues, a big EU fine over this matter doesn’t bode well for how Brussels will rule on the two other matters it has levied charges against Google over.
This column originally appeared on Real Money, our premium site for active traders. Click here to get great columns like this.
On Friday, June 16, the Financial Times reported the European Commission is expected to levy a large fine over the prominent placement its gives to Google Shopping ads (formerly known as Product Listing Ads) within search results, and how such placement puts rival shopping search platforms (for example, PriceGrabber or Shopzilla) at a competitive disadvantage. Two sources indicate the fine could top the €1 billion ($1.12 billion) penalty Intel Corp. (INTC) received from the EC in 2009.
The report suggests regulators were unconvinced by Google’s November 2016 defense of its Shopping ads, which appear at the top of relevant search result pages and on a standalone Google Shopping site. There, Google pointed out that the EC’s definition of shopping services excluded Amazon.com Inc (AMZN) , which a large percentage of consumers in the U.S. and Western Europe now directly visit to search for goods, rather than searching via Google. It also made the obvious point that many consumers find Google Shopping ads, which are typically accompanied by a photo and a price, to be useful when doing product searches, and that consumers are free to start a product search at a comparison shopping site or rival search engine.
Alphabet is a holding in Jim Cramer’s Action Alerts PLUS Charitable Trust Portfolio. Want to be alerted before Cramer buys or sells GOOGL? Learn more now.
The report also suggests the EC is unworried about stoking trade tensions with the U.S. — after having settled with Google on several matters in 2013, the FTC is only believed to be probing Google over its Android app bundling requirements. In 2015, President Obama claimed the EU’s attacks on Google amounted to protectionism, and — given his trade rhetoric — it’s not hard to image President Trump making a similar claim. On the other hand, Google’s ties to the Trump Administration aren’t exactly as strong as its ties to the Obama Administration.
As far as Google’s European ad sales go, the stakes in its EU battle are fairly high. Google’s AdWords search ad business is still easily the company’s biggest cash cow, and Shopping ads now account for a large percentage of the AdWords purchases made by online retailers — particularly when buying search keywords that don’t involve a specific brand. Shopping ads have especially seen big growth on smartphones, where they can take up quite a lot of screen real estate.